Sep 19 2008

Can Auto Insurance Reform Help California Go Green?

Californians have one month left to register their views on an innovative proposal by the state Department of Insurance to help the environment by fundamentally reforming the way we pay for auto insurance.

The new insurance option, proposed by Insurance Commissioner Steve Poizner, would let drivers pay by the mile, linking their costs more closely to actual car use--and thus car pollution--than is the case with traditional premiums. His proposal has reportedly been endorsed by the California Air Resources Board.

study published this summer by the Brookings Institution in Washington, D.C. explained the linkage between auto insurance and the environment:

The current lump-sum pricing of auto insurance is inefficient and inequitable. Drivers who are similar in other respects--age, gender, location, driving safety record--pay nearly the same premiums if they drive five thousand or fifty thousand miles a year. Just as an all-you-can-eat restaurant encourages more eat­ing, all-you-can-drive insurance pricing encourages more driving. That means more accidents, congestion, carbon emissions, local pollution, and dependence on oil. This pricing system is inequitable because low-mileage drivers subsidize insurance costs for high-mileage drivers, and low-income people drive fewer miles on average.

A better approach is simple and obvious: pay-as-you-drive (PAYD) auto insurance. . . . With insurance costs that vary with miles driven, people would be able to save money by reducing their driving, and this incentive would lead to fewer driving-related harms. PAYD would also be more equitable because it would eliminate the cross-subsidization of insurance costs from low-mileage to high-mileage drivers.

The Brookings research team concluded that California would see significant benefits from such a scheme:

The Insurance Commissioner's office says it has scheduled a public hearing on October 20, at 45 Fremont St. in San Francisco at 10 a.m., to take final comments on the plan. If approved, the plan will take effect not later than next fall.


Leave a comment


E-mail this post


Your Name:
Your Friend's Email:

Subscribe to Blog rssIcon

> Go

Recent Comments

  • This is being rather generous to Lutz. 1. The "Volt", in no small part, will be targeted as a product to people who care about energy and environmental issues. These people don't embrace Lutz' antideluvian concepts of rejecting science. How responsible is it for a GM executive to be rejecting the science? 2. As well, Lutz didn't exactly sound too enthusiastic about the Volt itself. 3. And, GM public communications has 'defended' Lutz in rather absurd ways. -A Siegel
    > view entry


  • This article is right on - small businesses have a huge role to play in sustainability. Not only do they add up in aggregate, but many small businesses operate in industries that can have a significant environmental impact depending on the exact practices, like dry cleaners, auto repair shops, etc. Green is also starting to affect the bottom line more and more, customers are increasingly voting with their feet for more sustainable businesses as can be seen from the growth of sites like http://www.ecovian.com. This is also a huge opportunity for small businesses to leapfrog their bigger brothers by being more agile in adopting these measures. -Emily
    > view entry


  • Great entry, Katie. Love the level of detail you managed to get in there! Probably won't be able to compete with coal and oil any time the next decade, but definitely a great technology to look into! Keep it up :) -Rune (Norway)
    > view entry


Recent Posts