Jul 15 2008

Study: Undersea Rocks Might Store Carbon Dioxide

Deep ocean-floor drilling and experiments show that volcanic rocks off the West Coast and elsewhere might be used to store huge amounts of global-warming carbon dioxide captured from electric power plants and other sources, a group of scientists at Columbia University says. Chemical reactions under 30,000 square miles of ocean floor off California, Oregon, Washington and British Columbia could lock in as much as 150 years of carbon dioxide production from the U.S., the scientists say. Their findings are published today in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Interest in storing the greenhouse gas is growing but no large-scale projects have emerged and other geological settings could be problematic. The oil industry has been pumping carbon dioxide into spaces left by old oil wells on a small scale, but some fear that these might eventually leak, sending the gas back into the air and possibly endangering people.

Lead author David Goldberg, a geophysicist at Columbia's Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, said the study is "the first good evidence that this kind of carbon burial is feasible."

"We are convinced that the sub-ocean floor is a significant part of the solution to the global climate problem," Goldberg said. "Basalt reservoirs are understudied. They are immense, accessible and well-sealed -- a huge prize in the search for viable options." A main advantage is a chemical process that takes place between basalt and pumped-in liquid carbon dioxide that would form a solid, nontoxic mineral. Basalt rock is formed by solidified lava.

Skeptics, however, point out that getting the carbon dioxide to undersea sites could be expensive and tricky. But Goldberg says the West Coast formations should be close enough to land for delivery by pipelines or tankers.


Leave a comment


E-mail this post


Your Name:
Your Friend's Email:

Subscribe to Blog rssIcon

> Go

Recent Comments

  • This is being rather generous to Lutz. 1. The "Volt", in no small part, will be targeted as a product to people who care about energy and environmental issues. These people don't embrace Lutz' antideluvian concepts of rejecting science. How responsible is it for a GM executive to be rejecting the science? 2. As well, Lutz didn't exactly sound too enthusiastic about the Volt itself. 3. And, GM public communications has 'defended' Lutz in rather absurd ways. -A Siegel
    > view entry


  • This article is right on - small businesses have a huge role to play in sustainability. Not only do they add up in aggregate, but many small businesses operate in industries that can have a significant environmental impact depending on the exact practices, like dry cleaners, auto repair shops, etc. Green is also starting to affect the bottom line more and more, customers are increasingly voting with their feet for more sustainable businesses as can be seen from the growth of sites like http://www.ecovian.com. This is also a huge opportunity for small businesses to leapfrog their bigger brothers by being more agile in adopting these measures. -Emily
    > view entry


  • Great entry, Katie. Love the level of detail you managed to get in there! Probably won't be able to compete with coal and oil any time the next decade, but definitely a great technology to look into! Keep it up :) -Rune (Norway)
    > view entry


Recent Posts