May 16 2008

Hacky Flack

So, today I experienced my first foray into my dual role as Environmental Communications Representative for PG&E and Reporter -- how sweet it is.

While attending the California Climate Action Registry Annual Conference on behalf of PG&E, I found myself merrily amidst the key players in others Navigating the Carbon World, as is the theme of this year's conference. In speaking with The Climate Registry's Executive Director Diane Wittenberg and Board Member Doug Scott, director of Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, I was able to glean a few insights into the carbon market today and what we can expect in the future.

And what I was able to glean is that we cannot have the market until we have the regulations to drive that market in a meaningful way -- which is what The Climate Registry seeks to develop. The U.S. needs standard, voluntary carbon reporting in order to create markets that are responsive to the need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. In Diane's words, "you've got to measure what you've got first."

In some sense, The Climate Registry must serve both masters -- voluntary and mandatory markets. A couple of months ago, we were able to see this happen with voluntary carbon offsets in California, with the signing of the first ever forest projects verified under California Climate Action Registry (CCAR) protocols. However, according to Doug Scott, we are still working on mandatory protocols.

The good news: The Climate Registry is working with the US EPA on its charge to develop reporting and is looking to the work already done, here in California and elsewhere. In fact, through The Climate Registry's work, 4/5ths of the country -- and the country's emissions -- is already working with The Climate Registry on these protocols...nothing to sneeze at. Bottom line is that The Climate Registry's objective is to stay nimble enough to sustain any changes at the Federal level. Amen.

When I safely positioned The Climate Registry as a sounding board for all regional protocols, I was promptly corrected that The Climate Registry is not just a sounding board, but an actual working mechanism for regions to create working policy that will hopefully translate to a national paradigm.

We will see what tomorrow holds but, as is the case with my dual-identity, today's news is indeed daunting and also enlightening on Navigating the Carbon World.


Leave a comment


E-mail this post


Your Name:
Your Friend's Email:

Subscribe to Blog rssIcon

> Go

Recent Comments

  • This is being rather generous to Lutz. 1. The "Volt", in no small part, will be targeted as a product to people who care about energy and environmental issues. These people don't embrace Lutz' antideluvian concepts of rejecting science. How responsible is it for a GM executive to be rejecting the science? 2. As well, Lutz didn't exactly sound too enthusiastic about the Volt itself. 3. And, GM public communications has 'defended' Lutz in rather absurd ways. -A Siegel
    > view entry


  • This article is right on - small businesses have a huge role to play in sustainability. Not only do they add up in aggregate, but many small businesses operate in industries that can have a significant environmental impact depending on the exact practices, like dry cleaners, auto repair shops, etc. Green is also starting to affect the bottom line more and more, customers are increasingly voting with their feet for more sustainable businesses as can be seen from the growth of sites like http://www.ecovian.com. This is also a huge opportunity for small businesses to leapfrog their bigger brothers by being more agile in adopting these measures. -Emily
    > view entry


  • Great entry, Katie. Love the level of detail you managed to get in there! Probably won't be able to compete with coal and oil any time the next decade, but definitely a great technology to look into! Keep it up :) -Rune (Norway)
    > view entry


Recent Posts