Apr 30 2008

More on Baseball and Clean Energy

Today the Philadelphia Phillies dipped their toes into the world of clean energy by purchasing 20 million kilowatt hours of Green-e Energy Certified Renewable Certificates (REC's).  The purchase will offset the energy use at Citizens Bank Park for the year.

As part of the EPA's Green Power Partnership, the Phillies' purchase is the largest purchase of renewable energy in professional sports. 

REC's are an interesting way of greening the Phillies' operations and part of a larger trend in Baseball teams becoming more environmentally friendly.  Len wrote an interesting post last month about how the Nationals introduced their new green ballpark.  And last year, PG&E partnered with the Giants on making AT&T Park the first major league stadium with solar energy.

It will be interesting to watch how environmental groups react to the Phillies' decision to use REC's. Some groups have argued that this approach is akin to a license to pollute.  Instead of focusing on producing clean energy or focusing on energy efficiency like the Nationals, opponents might argue that REC's aren't really helping to create cleaner energy.

We launched ClimateSmart - a voluntary customer carbon offset program - and ran into this argument.  We launched knowing that this would be a potential criticism; however, we designed the program using the most stringent protocols created by the California Climate Action Registry (CCAR). 

To do carbon offsetting well, one must account for additionality, which means that the project would not be done in the course of business if it weren't for the additional investment generated by the credit.  CCAR's protocols do account for additionality.  I am sure that the REC's created by the EPA do as well, but the Phillies should be aware of this issue when communicating to their fans. It's very complicated and could be a criticism, even if well-intended.

Posted by: Keely Wachs | Comments (1) digg delicioussend to a friendprint entry

 

Categories

Efficiency , Energy , Environment , Sustainable


1 Comments

The most exciting thing to me about this is that this represents a boost in investment for whatever technology the REC represents. One thing I've wondered is this:

What if more RECs are sold than can be delivered given the supply of 'green energy' available? Is that possible? Does the money just disappear into the grid or are we anywhere near the point were we should worry about this?

Comment by Nick Aster on May 2, 2008


Leave a comment


E-mail this post


Your Name:
Your Friend's Email:

Subscribe to Blog rssIcon

> Go

Recent Comments

  • This is being rather generous to Lutz. 1. The "Volt", in no small part, will be targeted as a product to people who care about energy and environmental issues. These people don't embrace Lutz' antideluvian concepts of rejecting science. How responsible is it for a GM executive to be rejecting the science? 2. As well, Lutz didn't exactly sound too enthusiastic about the Volt itself. 3. And, GM public communications has 'defended' Lutz in rather absurd ways. -A Siegel
    > view entry


  • This article is right on - small businesses have a huge role to play in sustainability. Not only do they add up in aggregate, but many small businesses operate in industries that can have a significant environmental impact depending on the exact practices, like dry cleaners, auto repair shops, etc. Green is also starting to affect the bottom line more and more, customers are increasingly voting with their feet for more sustainable businesses as can be seen from the growth of sites like http://www.ecovian.com. This is also a huge opportunity for small businesses to leapfrog their bigger brothers by being more agile in adopting these measures. -Emily
    > view entry


  • Great entry, Katie. Love the level of detail you managed to get in there! Probably won't be able to compete with coal and oil any time the next decade, but definitely a great technology to look into! Keep it up :) -Rune (Norway)
    > view entry


Recent Posts